Votes · 16 September 2026

Attorney-General Motion of censure

Amendment. A vote on changing the wording of a motion or bill. Voting against a change can mean "not like this", not opposition to the idea.A vote on changing the wording of a motion or bill. Voting against a change can mean "not like this", not opposition to the idea.

Ms Carrick's changes adding another reason to the censure: no assessment of moving Access Canberra into Woden Library. They passed. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

Question as recorded: That Ms Carrick’s proposed amendments to Mr Parton’s motion, as amended, be agreed to.

Question resolved in the affirmative. Ayes 12, Noes 9.

LaborACT GreensIndependentIndependentCanberra Liberals

Ayes

Noes

Ayes (12)

Andrew BraddockACT Greens
Chiaka BarryCanberra Liberals
Deborah MorrisCanberra Liberals
Ed CocksCanberra Liberals
Fiona CarrickIndependent
Jeremy HansonCanberra Liberals
Jo ClayACT Greens
Laura NuttallACT Greens
Mark PartonCanberra Liberals
Peter CainCanberra Liberals
Rebecca VassarottiACT Greens
Thomas EmersonIndependent

Noes (9)

Issues this vote is grouped under

Grouping a vote under an issue is our interpretation, not part of the official record.

Censures and criticism of ministersReview in progress
Voting Aye would count (review in progress) as for “Formally criticise or censure ministers”. It added to the criticism.

Source

Hansard, 2026-09-16, p. 2653 (ACT Legislative Assembly)

Names are as recorded in the source. Group is the member’s ballot group at their last election, or the name they now sit under where that has changed. Members not listed have no recorded vote in this division; that doesn’t mean they abstained.

Report an error on this page