Votes · 24 March 2026

Fuel security—impact on cost of living

Amendment. A vote on changing the wording of a motion or bill. Voting against a change can mean "not like this", not opposition to the idea.A vote on changing the wording of a motion or bill. Voting against a change can mean "not like this", not opposition to the idea.

A Greens change to a Liberal motion on fuel prices. It swapped a call to cut fuel excise for free public transport for concession card holders and a tax on gas exports. It was voted down. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

Question as recorded: That the amendment be agreed to.

Question resolved in the negative. Ayes 6, Noes 16.

LaborACT GreensIndependentIndependentCanberra Liberals

Ayes

Noes

Ayes (6)

Andrew BraddockACT Greens
Fiona CarrickIndependent
Jo ClayACT Greens
Laura NuttallACT Greens
Shane RattenburyACT Greens
Thomas EmersonIndependent

Noes (16)

Andrew BarrLabor
Caitlin ToughLabor
Chiaka BarryCanberra Liberals
Chris SteelLabor
Ed CocksCanberra Liberals
James MilliganCanberra Liberals
Jeremy HansonCanberra Liberals
Leanne CastleyCanberra Liberals
Marisa PatersonLabor
Mark PartonCanberra Liberals
Michael PetterssonLabor
Peter CainCanberra Liberals
Rachel Stephen-SmithLabor
Suzanne OrrLabor
Taimus Werner-GibbingsLabor
Tara CheyneLabor

Issues this vote is grouped under

Grouping a vote under an issue is our interpretation, not part of the official record.

Public transport commitmentsReview in progress
Voting Aye would count (review in progress) as for “Commit to more or faster public transport than the government has planned”. It called for free and cheaper public transport.

Source

Hansard, 2026-03-24, p. 1125 (ACT Legislative Assembly)

Names are as recorded in the source. Group is the member’s ballot group at their last election, or the name they now sit under where that has changed. Members not listed have no recorded vote in this division; that doesn’t mean they abstained.

Report an error on this page