Votes · 14 May 2025

Planning and development—Fadden telecommunications tower site options

Amendment. A vote on changing the wording of a motion or bill. Voting against a change can mean "not like this", not opposition to the idea.A vote on changing the wording of a motion or bill. Voting against a change can mean "not like this", not opposition to the idea.

The planning minister's change to a Liberal motion about where a phone tower should go in Fadden. It replaced the final call with publishing the government's assessment of other sites. It passed. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

Question as recorded: That Mr Steel’s amendment be agreed to.

Question resolved in the affirmative. Ayes 15, Noes 8.

LaborACT GreensIndependentIndependentCanberra Liberals

Ayes

Noes

Ayes (15)

Noes (8)

Chiaka BarryCanberra Liberals
Deborah MorrisCanberra Liberals
Ed CocksCanberra Liberals
James MilliganCanberra Liberals
Jeremy HansonCanberra Liberals
Leanne CastleyCanberra Liberals
Mark PartonCanberra Liberals
Peter CainCanberra Liberals

Source

Hansard, 2025-05-14, p. 1664 (ACT Legislative Assembly)

Names are as recorded in the source. Group is the member’s ballot group at their last election, or the name they now sit under where that has changed. Members not listed have no recorded vote in this division; that doesn’t mean they abstained.

Report an error on this page