Votes · 18 March 2025

Building and construction—regulation

Amendment. A vote on changing the wording of a motion or bill. Voting against a change can mean "not like this", not opposition to the idea.A vote on changing the wording of a motion or bill. Voting against a change can mean "not like this", not opposition to the idea.

A Greens change to the same motion, replacing the Liberal calls with an internal review and community consultation. It passed. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

Question as recorded: That Ms Clay’s amendment, as amended, be agreed to.

Question resolved in the affirmative. Ayes 15, Noes 8.

LaborACT GreensIndependentIndependentCanberra Liberals

Ayes

Noes

Ayes (15)

Noes (8)

Chiaka BarryCanberra Liberals
Deborah MorrisCanberra Liberals
Ed CocksCanberra Liberals
James MilliganCanberra Liberals
Jeremy HansonCanberra Liberals
Leanne CastleyCanberra Liberals
Mark PartonCanberra Liberals
Peter CainCanberra Liberals

Issues this vote is grouped under

Grouping a vote under an issue is our interpretation, not part of the official record.

Building rules and costsReview in progress
Voting No would count (review in progress) as for “Hold back new building rules that add to the cost of new homes”. It replaced the commitment to hold back cost-adding rules with a review.

Source

Hansard, 2025-03-18, p. 654, #question-put-2 (ACT Legislative Assembly)

Names are as recorded in the source. Group is the member’s ballot group at their last election, or the name they now sit under where that has changed. Members not listed have no recorded vote in this division; that doesn’t mean they abstained.

Report an error on this page