Under development - Internal review only - do not share

Issues · Crime and justice

Review in progress6 recorded votes

Tougher crime laws

Votes on whether to make criminal laws tougher and give police more powers.

Votes on bail, bikie gangs, drug laws, knife searches, the age of criminal responsibility and similar laws.

Review in progress. The votes and names below are exactly as recorded in Hansard. Which votes belong under this issue, and which side counts as “for”, is our interpretation, and it is still being reviewed, so we show each MLA’s Aye or No rather than a pattern.

What this can’t tell you

  • Most decisions in the Assembly are made on the voices, with no names recorded. Only recorded votes appear here.
  • Many of these votes are on changes to someone else’s motion. Voting against a change can mean “not like this” or “not funded yet”, not opposition to the idea. Each vote shows its stage.
  • “No recorded vote” can mean the MLA wasn’t a member yet, or didn’t vote. It never means they abstained.

Each MLA

One square per vote, oldest first. A Aye, N No (not yet checked), no recorded vote.

The votes

  1. 1. 6 March 2025 · Crimes (Child Sex Offenders) Amendment Bill 2025Amendment. A vote on changing the wording of a motion or bill. Voting against a change can mean "not like this", not opposition to the idea.Review in progress

    Liberal changes to a bill on child sex offenders that would have stopped convicted offenders from working in legal services that deal with children. They were voted down. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

    Question as recorded: That Ms Morris’s amendments Nos 1 and 2 be agreed to. Question resolved in the negative.

    Voting Aye would count as for this issue (review in progress). The changes would have added a new restriction on convicted child sex offenders.

    Ayes 8, Noes 15. Who voted each way · Official record, p. 490 ·

  2. 2. 19 March 2025 · Justice—bail law reformAmendment. A vote on changing the wording of a motion or bill. Voting against a change can mean "not like this", not opposition to the idea.Review in progress

    The government's changes to a Liberal motion calling for tougher bail laws. The changes replaced those calls with the government's own approach, including diversion programs. They passed. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

    Question as recorded: That Ms Cheyne’s amendments, as amended, be agreed to. Question resolved in the affirmative.

    Voting No would count as for this issue (review in progress). The changes removed the calls for tougher bail laws.

    Ayes 15, Noes 8. Who voted each way · Official record, p. 762 ·

  3. 3. 9 April 2025 · Crime—anti-consorting lawsAmendment. A vote on changing the wording of a motion or bill. Voting against a change can mean "not like this", not opposition to the idea.Review in progress

    The government's change to a Liberal motion on bikie gangs. It removed a call to bring in anti-consorting laws, which stop known gang members meeting. It passed. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

    Question as recorded: That the amendment be agreed to. Question resolved in the affirmative.

    Voting No would count as for this issue (review in progress). The change removed the call for anti-consorting laws.

    Ayes 15, Noes 8. Who voted each way · Official record, p. 1067 ·

  4. 4. 9 April 2025 · Crimes Legislation Amendment Bill 2025Bill: agreed in principle. The vote on whether a bill should go ahead at all, before its details are considered.Review in progress

    The bill to raise the age at which children can be charged with a crime to 14. It passed its first stage. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

    Question as recorded: That this bill be agreed to in principle. Question resolved in the affirmative.

    Voting No would count as for this issue (review in progress). Raising the age means fewer children can be charged, the opposite of a tougher law.

    Ayes 14, Noes 7. Who voted each way · Official record, p. 1093 ·

  5. 5. 21 October 2025 · Drugs of dependence—recriminalisationQuestion not printed. Hansard records the division but not the exact question, so its stage can't be shown.Review in progress

    A Liberal motion calling on the government to undo the 2023 decriminalisation of small amounts of hard drugs. It was voted down. (Hansard does not print the exact question.) (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

    Question as recorded: (The question put is not printed in Hansard.) Question resolved in the negative.

    Voting Aye would count as for this issue (review in progress). It called for drug possession to be a crime again.

    Ayes 6, Noes 13. Who voted each way · Official record, p. 3262 ·

  6. 6. 5 May 2026 · Knife crime—police powersFinal vote on a motion. The deciding vote on a motion, as worded at the time.Review in progress

    A Liberal motion asking for police to be able to use handheld metal detectors to find knives in nightlife areas. It was voted down. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

    Question as recorded: That the motion be agreed to. Question resolved in the negative.

    Voting Aye would count as for this issue (review in progress). It called for new police search powers.

    Ayes 8, Noes 15. Who voted each way · Official record, p. 1464 ·

Other Assembly decisions on crime and justice

42 decisions on this topic since November 2024, newest first. Most were decided on the voices, without a recorded vote. Grouped into this topic by key words, so a few may belong elsewhere.

See all 42 on the Decisions page →

What Canberrans said about crime and justice

19%picked “Enhancing community safety” as one of their top three priorities for the ACT Government
40%of everyone surveyed agreed enough is currently being done about it

What they most wanted

  • Increase investment in police resources and community policing82%
  • Enhance safety in public spaces and facilities59%
  • Focus on early intervention and prevention services55%

From the 2025 Community Priorities Survey (ACT Government, YourSay Panel, summary report, April 2026), carried out 21 October to 4 November 2025: 1,801 people answered. An opt-in panel of Canberrans aged 18 and over, with extra young people recruited through a second panel, weighted by age, gender and region to match the 2021 Census. “What they most wanted” is out of the 355 people who picked this area; each could choose up to three. This shows what people told one survey. It isn’t a vote, and it doesn’t say how any MLA should vote.

How issues are put together · Report an error on this page