Under development - Internal review only - do not share

Issues · Housing

Review in progress1 recorded vote

Public housing quotas

Votes on whether to require a set share of public housing in new developments.

Votes on fixed requirements for public and community housing in new precincts.

Review in progress. The votes and names below are exactly as recorded in Hansard. Which votes belong under this issue, and which side counts as “for”, is our interpretation, and it is still being reviewed, so we show each MLA’s Aye or No rather than a pattern.

What this can’t tell you

  • Most decisions in the Assembly are made on the voices, with no names recorded. Only recorded votes appear here.
  • Many of these votes are on changes to someone else’s motion. Voting against a change can mean “not like this” or “not funded yet”, not opposition to the idea. Each vote shows its stage.
  • “No recorded vote” can mean the MLA wasn’t a member yet, or didn’t vote. It never means they abstained.

Each MLA

One square per vote, oldest first. A Aye, N No (not yet checked), no recorded vote.

The votes

  1. 1. 15 September 2026 · Housing—Thoroughbred Park precinctAmendment. A vote on changing the wording of a motion or bill. Voting against a change can mean "not like this", not opposition to the idea.Review in progress

    The planning minister's changes to a Greens motion on new housing at Thoroughbred Park. They removed the requirement that 10% of homes be public housing and the call to set aside land for schools. They passed. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

    Question as recorded: That the amendments be agreed to. Question resolved in the affirmative.

    Voting No would count as for this issue (review in progress). The changes removed the 10% public housing requirement.

    Ayes 15, Noes 6. Who voted each way · Official record, p. 2583 ·

Other Assembly decisions on housing

16 decisions on this topic since November 2024, newest first. Most were decided on the voices, without a recorded vote. Grouped into this topic by key words, so a few may belong elsewhere.

See all 16 on the Decisions page →

What Canberrans said about housing

31%picked “Improving housing choice and affordability” as one of their top three priorities for the ACT Government
24%of everyone surveyed agreed enough is currently being done about it

What they most wanted

  • Deliver more public, community, and affordable rental homes69%
  • Change planning rules to enable more housing choice and supply48%
  • Help renters who are struggling financially46%

From the 2025 Community Priorities Survey (ACT Government, YourSay Panel, summary report, April 2026), carried out 21 October to 4 November 2025: 1,801 people answered. An opt-in panel of Canberrans aged 18 and over, with extra young people recruited through a second panel, weighted by age, gender and region to match the 2021 Census. “What they most wanted” is out of the 503 people who picked this area; each could choose up to three. This shows what people told one survey. It isn’t a vote, and it doesn’t say how any MLA should vote.

How issues are put together · Report an error on this page