Under development - Internal review only - do not share

Issues · Crime and justice

Review in progress3 recorded votes

Police resources and stations

Votes on whether to commit to more police resources, or a Molonglo Valley police station sooner, than the government has planned.

Votes on opposition motions calling for more police funding and a faster timeline for the promised Molonglo Valley police station, and on the government's changes to them.

Review in progress. The votes and names below are exactly as recorded in Hansard. Which votes belong under this issue, and which side counts as “for”, is our interpretation, and it is still being reviewed, so we show each MLA’s Aye or No rather than a pattern.

What this can’t tell you

  • Most decisions in the Assembly are made on the voices, with no names recorded. Only recorded votes appear here.
  • Many of these votes are on changes to someone else’s motion. Voting against a change can mean “not like this” or “not funded yet”, not opposition to the idea. Each vote shows its stage.
  • “No recorded vote” can mean the MLA wasn’t a member yet, or didn’t vote. It never means they abstained.

Each MLA

One square per vote, oldest first. A Aye, N No (not yet checked), no recorded vote.

The votes

  1. 1. 8 April 2025 · ACT Policing—Molonglo Valley and Weston CreekAmendment. A vote on changing the wording of a motion or bill. Voting against a change can mean "not like this", not opposition to the idea.Review in progress

    The police minister's change to a Liberal motion about a police station in the Molonglo Valley. It removed the call to build, equip and staff the station. It passed. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

    Question as recorded: That the amendment be agreed to. Question resolved in the affirmative.

    Voting No would count as for this issue (review in progress). The change removed the call to build and staff the station.

    Ayes 14, Noes 9. Who voted each way · Official record, p. 966 ·

  2. 2. 19 March 2026 · ACT Policing—resourcingFinal vote on a motion. The deciding vote on a motion, as worded at the time.Review in progress

    A Liberal motion saying police funding had fallen behind and calling for more resources. It was voted down. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

    Question as recorded: That the motion be agreed to. Question resolved in the negative.

    Voting Aye would count as for this issue (review in progress). A vote for more police resources.

    Ayes 7, Noes 14. Who voted each way · Official record, p. 1003 ·

  3. 3. 22 September 2026 · Molonglo Valley—crimeAmendment. A vote on changing the wording of a motion or bill. Voting against a change can mean "not like this", not opposition to the idea.Review in progress

    The police minister's change to a Liberal motion on crime in the Molonglo Valley. It replaced calls for more patrols and an urgent police station with a report back in 2027. It passed. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

    Question as recorded: That the amendment be agreed to. Question resolved in the affirmative.

    Voting No would count as for this issue (review in progress). The change removed the calls for more patrols and an urgent police station.

    Ayes 13, Noes 8. Who voted each way · Official record, p. 2962 ·

Other Assembly decisions on crime and justice

42 decisions on this topic since November 2024, newest first. Most were decided on the voices, without a recorded vote. Grouped into this topic by key words, so a few may belong elsewhere.

See all 42 on the Decisions page →

What Canberrans said about crime and justice

19%picked “Enhancing community safety” as one of their top three priorities for the ACT Government
40%of everyone surveyed agreed enough is currently being done about it

What they most wanted

  • Increase investment in police resources and community policing82%
  • Enhance safety in public spaces and facilities59%
  • Focus on early intervention and prevention services55%

From the 2025 Community Priorities Survey (ACT Government, YourSay Panel, summary report, April 2026), carried out 21 October to 4 November 2025: 1,801 people answered. An opt-in panel of Canberrans aged 18 and over, with extra young people recruited through a second panel, weighted by age, gender and region to match the 2021 Census. “What they most wanted” is out of the 355 people who picked this area; each could choose up to three. This shows what people told one survey. It isn’t a vote, and it doesn’t say how any MLA should vote.

How issues are put together · Report an error on this page