Under development - Internal review only - do not share

Issues · Housing

Review in progress3 recorded votes

The ACT's housing debt

Votes on whether to publicly criticise federal Labor MPs over the ACT's historic housing debt.

The ACT owes the Commonwealth about $66 million in old housing debt. These votes are about how strongly the Assembly should criticise federal Labor for not waiving it.

Review in progress. The votes and names below are exactly as recorded in Hansard. Which votes belong under this issue, and which side counts as “for”, is our interpretation, and it is still being reviewed, so we show each MLA’s Aye or No rather than a pattern.

What this can’t tell you

  • Most decisions in the Assembly are made on the voices, with no names recorded. Only recorded votes appear here.
  • Many of these votes are on changes to someone else’s motion. Voting against a change can mean “not like this” or “not funded yet”, not opposition to the idea. Each vote shows its stage.
  • “No recorded vote” can mean the MLA wasn’t a member yet, or didn’t vote. It never means they abstained.

Each MLA

One square per vote, oldest first. A Aye, N No (not yet checked), no recorded vote.

The votes

  1. 1. 25 March 2026 · Public housing—debt to commonwealthAmendment. A vote on changing the wording of a motion or bill. Voting against a change can mean "not like this", not opposition to the idea.Review in progress

    The housing minister's change to a Liberal motion on the ACT's housing debt. It would have replaced condemning Senator Gallagher with simply asking the Commonwealth to waive the debt. It was voted down. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

    Question as recorded: That Ms Berry’s amendment No 2 be agreed to. Question resolved in the negative.

    Voting No would count as for this issue (review in progress). It would have removed the criticism of federal Labor.

    Ayes 8, Noes 12. Who voted each way · Official record, p. 1231 ·

  2. 2. 25 March 2026 · Public housing—debt to commonwealthAmendment. A vote on changing the wording of a motion or bill. Voting against a change can mean "not like this", not opposition to the idea.Review in progress

    A Greens change widening the criticism to the ACT's Labor members in the federal House of Representatives. It passed. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

    Question as recorded: That Mr Rattenbury’s amendment No 1 be agreed to. Question resolved in the affirmative.

    Voting Aye would count as for this issue (review in progress). It extended the criticism to more federal Labor MPs.

    Ayes 12, Noes 8. Who voted each way · Official record, p. 1238 ·

  3. 3. 25 March 2026 · Public housing—debt to commonwealthFinal vote on a motion, as amended. The deciding vote on a motion after earlier votes changed its wording.Review in progress

    The final motion criticising federal Labor MPs for not waiving the ACT's housing debt. It passed. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

    Question as recorded: That the motion, as amended, be agreed to. Question resolved in the affirmative.

    Voting Aye would count as for this issue (review in progress). A vote for the criticism.

    Ayes 12, Noes 8. Who voted each way · Official record, p. 1242 ·

Other Assembly decisions on housing

16 decisions on this topic since November 2024, newest first. Most were decided on the voices, without a recorded vote. Grouped into this topic by key words, so a few may belong elsewhere.

See all 16 on the Decisions page →

What Canberrans said about housing

31%picked “Improving housing choice and affordability” as one of their top three priorities for the ACT Government
24%of everyone surveyed agreed enough is currently being done about it

What they most wanted

  • Deliver more public, community, and affordable rental homes69%
  • Change planning rules to enable more housing choice and supply48%
  • Help renters who are struggling financially46%

From the 2025 Community Priorities Survey (ACT Government, YourSay Panel, summary report, April 2026), carried out 21 October to 4 November 2025: 1,801 people answered. An opt-in panel of Canberrans aged 18 and over, with extra young people recruited through a second panel, weighted by age, gender and region to match the 2021 Census. “What they most wanted” is out of the 503 people who picked this area; each could choose up to three. This shows what people told one survey. It isn’t a vote, and it doesn’t say how any MLA should vote.

How issues are put together · Report an error on this page