Under development - Internal review only - do not share

Issues · Climate and environment

Review in progress4 recorded votes

Rules for data centres

Votes on whether to set strict environmental conditions on new data centres.

Votes on whether new data centres must use renewable energy, save water and avoid raising household bills.

Review in progress. The votes and names below are exactly as recorded in Hansard. Which votes belong under this issue, and which side counts as “for”, is our interpretation, and it is still being reviewed, so we show each MLA’s Aye or No rather than a pattern.

What this can’t tell you

  • Most decisions in the Assembly are made on the voices, with no names recorded. Only recorded votes appear here.
  • Many of these votes are on changes to someone else’s motion. Voting against a change can mean “not like this” or “not funded yet”, not opposition to the idea. Each vote shows its stage.
  • “No recorded vote” can mean the MLA wasn’t a member yet, or didn’t vote. It never means they abstained.

Each MLA

One square per vote, oldest first. A Aye, N No (not yet checked), no recorded vote.

The votes

  1. 1. 24 September 2026 · Energy—data centresAmendment to an amendment (4 levels deep). A vote on changing someone else's proposed change. It is a step along the way, not the final decision, and members often vote on wording or tactics here.Review in progress

    Mr Emerson's changes on data centres, adding warnings about higher bills and water use and applying the standards to centres approved before the new rules start. They were voted down. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

    Question as recorded: That Mr Emerson’s amendment to Miss Nuttall’s proposed amendment to Mr Barr’s proposed amendment to Mr Milligan’s proposed amendment be agreed to. Question resolved in the negative.

    Voting Aye would count as for this issue (review in progress). They would have added stronger conditions.

    Ayes 6, Noes 15. Who voted each way · Official record, p. 3261 · Official record, Minutes No 70, item 17 ·

  2. 2. 24 September 2026 · Energy—data centresAmendment to an amendment (3 levels deep). A vote on changing someone else's proposed change. It is a step along the way, not the final decision, and members often vote on wording or tactics here.Review in progress

    Greens changes requiring data centres to use 100% renewable power and closed-loop water cooling. They were voted down. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

    Question as recorded: That Miss Nuttall’s proposed amendment to Mr Barr’s proposed amendment to Mr Milligan’s proposed amendment be agreed to. Question resolved in the negative.

    Voting Aye would count as for this issue (review in progress). They would have added strict environmental conditions.

    Ayes 6, Noes 15. Who voted each way · Official record, p. 3261 · Official record, Minutes No 70, item 17 ·

  3. 3. 24 September 2026 · Energy—data centresAmendment. A vote on changing the wording of a motion or bill. Voting against a change can mean "not like this", not opposition to the idea.Review in progress

    A Liberal rewrite of a Greens data centre motion, as changed by Labor, focused on attracting investment while not passing energy costs to households. It passed. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

    Question as recorded: That Mr Milligan’s amendment, as amended, be agreed to. Question resolved in the affirmative.

    Voting No would count as for this issue (review in progress). It replaced the Greens' strict conditions with an investment-focused approach.

    Ayes 15, Noes 6. Who voted each way · Official record, p. 3262 · Official record, Minutes No 70, item 17 ·

  4. 4. 24 September 2026 · Energy—data centresFinal vote on a motion, as amended. The deciding vote on a motion after earlier votes changed its wording.Review in progress

    The final data centre motion, in its rewritten form. It passed. (our summary; the question as recorded is below)

    Question as recorded: That the original question, as amended, be agreed to. Question resolved in the affirmative.

    Voting No would count as for this issue (review in progress). The final motion no longer included the strict conditions.

    Ayes 15, Noes 6. Who voted each way · Official record, p. 3264 · Official record, Minutes No 70, item 17 ·

Other Assembly decisions on climate and environment

13 decisions on this topic since November 2024, newest first. Most were decided on the voices, without a recorded vote. Grouped into this topic by key words, so a few may belong elsewhere.

See all 13 on the Decisions page →

What Canberrans said about climate and environment

15%picked “Taking climate action and switching to clean energy” as one of their top three priorities for the ACT Government
60%of everyone surveyed agreed enough is currently being done about it

What they most wanted

  • Support energy-efficiency upgrades/electrification of buildings62%
  • Protect and restore the natural environment57%
  • Stronger regulations and policies to reduce emissions53%

From the 2025 Community Priorities Survey (ACT Government, YourSay Panel, summary report, April 2026), carried out 21 October to 4 November 2025: 1,801 people answered. An opt-in panel of Canberrans aged 18 and over, with extra young people recruited through a second panel, weighted by age, gender and region to match the 2021 Census. “What they most wanted” is out of the 283 people who picked this area; each could choose up to three. This shows what people told one survey. It isn’t a vote, and it doesn’t say how any MLA should vote.

How issues are put together · Report an error on this page