Under development - Internal review only - do not share

ACT Legislative Assembly · 73 sitting days

How Canberra’s decisions take shape

What your MLAs propose, what others change, and what the Assembly agrees.

What the record shows

Most motions that pass are changed first

MLAs outside the ministry brought 167 motions and 155 passed. 100 of those 155 were changed by another MLA before the final vote.

A change can be a compromise, a correction or a rewrite. When a change is agreed, its mover won a majority of the Assembly over to their wording; that shows influence, not whether the motion got better or worse. Ministers’ motions aren’t counted here. A motion co-sponsored by MLAs from two groups counts in each group's row, and once in the total above. Select a group to read its motions.

Explore the record

Three ways into the same 73 sitting days. Filters carry across all three.

Some MLAs bring more motions. Others spend more time changing motions already on the table. They’re different jobs, and neither is better. Pick anyone to see what they actually did.

Chart options

Colour shows party. On the chart, shape shows role.

Scatter chart. Across: motions brought. Up: changes with wording found in the final text. The same figures are listed for each MLA in the list of representatives.

Opposition

Crossbench

Government backbench

Chiaka Barry brought 12 motions (3 co-sponsored with other MLAs) and proposed 4 changes to proposals. 3 were agreed, and for 2 the new wording was found in the final text.

For comparison, the middle MLA outside the ministry brought 10 and proposed 4 changes.

How this is counted
  • Motions brought: motions an MLA moved, not counting procedure or bills. Document orders count as motions. When the Minutes name more than one mover (a co-sponsored motion), it counts once for each of them.
  • Changes with wording found in the final text: Agreed changes where at least 90% of the new wording appears in the final text the Minutes print. It's a match on the words, not a judgement of how much the change mattered.
  • Ministers are shown separately because most of their work is Government bills. Roles come from the titles printed in the Minutes, so the dates someone joined or left the ministry are approximate. Caitlin Tough appears as a backbencher until September 2026 and as a minister after.
  • Members served different lengths of time. Shane Rattenbury left in May 2026 and Rebecca Vassarotti joined in June 2026.
  • 6 Nov 2024 to 22 Oct 2026, 73 sitting days, read automatically from the Minutes of Proceedings. Numbers 71–73 are proofs.

What MLAs add to other people’s motions

Every MLA outside the ministry, in alphabetical order. For each: the motions they brought, how many of the changes they proposed were agreed, and what those changes tend to add.

Bringing motions and changing other people’s are both part of the job, and neither count says how much something mattered. When the Minutes name more than one MLA as moving a motion (co-sponsored), it counts as brought for each of them, so these numbers add up to more than the number of motions. Why the numbers look like this: Labor governs in minority, with 10 of the 25 seats, so it needs at least three votes from outside Labor to pass anything. Changes from the Greens, the independents or the Liberals are often agreed as part of getting that support, and the opposition brings most motions. A change counts as found word for word when at least 90% of its new wording is in the final text; changes that only take words out, bill amendments and motions whose final text isn’t printed can’t be checked that way. The line under each name is our summary of every change that MLA moved. Select a name to see the changes it rests on.

Decisions worth a look

How these are picked: the passed motion that the most MLAs changed (counted by computer), then our most recent write-ups, newest first.

  1. Four MLAs changed this motion before it passedA motion to censure the Minister for City and Government Services, brought by Mark Parton (Liberal). Andrew Braddock (Greens), Tara Cheyne (Labor), Ed Cocks (Liberal) and Fiona Carrick (Independent) each had a change agreed. It passed 13 to 10.Follow the decision Grouped by key words
  2. A 10% public housing requirement became a call with no percentageJo Clay's motion on the Thoroughbred Park precinct asked the Government to require 10% rent-fixed public housing. The agreed version, changed by Chris Steel, asks it to ensure developers provide public and community housing.The change was agreed 15 to 6: Labor MLAs and Liberal MLAs for, Greens MLAs and independents against.Follow the decision Our summary, review in progress
  3. A 50c fare trial became a call to consider free fares for concession holdersMark Parton's motion during the 2026 fuel-supply crisis asked for a 50c public transport fare trial. The agreed version, changed by Chris Steel, asks the Government to consider free public transport for concession card holders, and asks for federal funding for free fares during the crisis and 50-cent fares after it.Follow the decision Our summary, review in progress

Explore for yourself

How we check what’s here

Everything on this page comes from the Assembly’s Minutes of Proceedings. Different parts have been checked to different degrees, and each is labelled quietly where it appears.

Official record
What was moved, by whom, the wording, whether it was agreed, and any recorded vote. These are copied from the Minutes, and each decision links to the sitting day it came from.
Read automatically
Counts, titles, who changed what, and whether a change’s new words appear in the final text, read directly from the Minutes. If any differ from the Minutes, the Minutes are correct. “Wording found in the final text” means at least 90% of the new words appear there. It’s a match on words, not proof that the change mattered.
Grouped by key words
Issues and kinds of change grouped from the wording. Useful for browsing, though a few may be misfiled.
Our summary, review in progress
Summaries, headlines and notes about an MLA, written from the full wording in the Minutes. The Minutes are the authority, and each summary links to them.
Reviewed against the Minutes
Compared with the source by a named reviewer. Nothing on this page has reached this stage yet.

When the Assembly agrees on the voices, the Minutes record the result but not who said yes or no, so this page never says who supported those decisions. Agreeing to a motion is also not the same as doing what it asks. Spotted something wrong? Each decision links to its source so you can check, and you can report an error here.

Source: ACT Legislative Assembly, Minutes of Proceedings, Nos 1–73 (3 still proofs), read automatically. Agreeing to a motion is not the same as doing what it asks. This page describes what was proposed and agreed; it does not rate anyone. Official chamber documents