← All decisions

1. What was proposedLeanne CastleyLiberal · Opposition
   Original wording

   That, in accordance with standing order 213A, the Assembly orders the Minister for Transport to provide the Assembly with: (1) any business cases and post-implementation reviews relating to the development of the light rail network, including individual stages; (2) the current schedule for the development of each stage of light rail; (3) the Early Presentation of Project, Investment Logic Map, and any draft or indicative business cases, economic appraisals, or economic evaluations of Light Rail Stage 2B; (4) the estimated total capital cost for Stage 2B, including enabling works, rolling stock, and all other relevant expenses; and (5) actual capital expenditure on light rail, including all planning, design and construction costs, and Commonwealth contributions to light rail capital expenditure, for each financial year (2013-2014 to 2023-2024).

2. Proposed changeChris SteelLabor · Minister19 March 2025

   Set a 30-day deadline for the documents. Our summary, review in progress

   The exact wording of this change

   After paragraph (5), add new paragraph: “(6) not withstanding provisions of standing order 213A, material is to be provided within 30 days.”. Debate continued.

   Agreed on the voices. No individual votes were recorded. Its wording is in the final text.

3. What the Assembly decidedAgreed

   Decided on the voices: no individual votes were recorded, so this doesn’t show that every MLA agreed.

   Final agreed wording, with changes marked

   That: (1) in accordance with standing order 213A, the Assembly orders the Minister for Transport to provide the Assembly with: (a) any business cases and post-implementation reviews relating to the development of the light rail network, including individual stages; (b) the current schedule for the development of each stage of light rail; (c) the Early Presentation of Project, Investment Logic Map, and any draft or indicative business cases, economic appraisals, or economic evaluations of Light Rail Stage 2B; (d) the estimated total capital cost for Stage 2B, including enabling works, rolling stock, and all other relevant expenses; and (e) actual capital expenditure on light rail, including all planning, design and construction costs, and Commonwealth contributions to light rail capital expenditure, for each financial year (2013-2014 to 2023-2024); and (2) not withstanding provisions of standing order 213A, material is to be provided within 30 days.

   Original and final wording compared

   taken out put in

   That: [put in: (1)]in accordance with standing order 213A, the Assembly orders the Minister for Transport to provide the Assembly with: [taken out: (1)][put in: (a)]any business cases and post-implementation reviews relating to the development of the light rail network, including individual stages; [taken out: (2)][put in: (b)]the current schedule for the development of each stage of light rail; [taken out: (3)][put in: (c)]the Early Presentation of Project, Investment Logic Map, and any draft or indicative business cases, economic appraisals, or economic evaluations of Light Rail Stage 2B; [taken out: (4)][put in: (d)]the estimated total capital cost for Stage 2B, including enabling works, rolling stock, and all other relevant expenses; and [taken out: (5)][put in: (e)]actual capital expenditure on light rail, including all planning, design and construction costs, and Commonwealth contributions to light rail capital expenditure, for each financial year (2013-2014 to 2023-2024); [put in: and (2) not withstanding provisions of standing order 213A, material is to be provided within 30 days.]

   Compared word by word by computer, ignoring punctuation. It shows what differs, not which change made each difference; the steps above show that.